Source selection
We use public health guidance for general health questions, professional organisations for descriptions of therapy and specialist organisations for abuse and sexual-violence support. We link to the specific source where possible. Provider websites are used for service descriptions, locations and stated arrangements, not as independent evidence of superior outcomes.
Original examples and exercises
Practical scripts, reflection prompts and check-in formats are original educational examples. They are not diagnostic instruments or validated treatment protocols. Readers can adapt or decline them. We do not assign a numerical relationship-health score or infer a diagnosis from a short list of behaviours.
Clinical and safety boundaries
Clinical topics identify when assessment may be needed. Articles distinguish ordinary conflict from coercion and abuse, where joint exercises can be unsafe. General information cannot determine what is safe in an individual situation.
Authorship and review
RelationshipInfo is responsible for this publication. AI assistance was used to draft and organise the initial content. We do not imply that a named clinician has authored or individually reviewed a page unless that involvement is documented and displayed. Source-check dates describe source checks, not a clinical review of the reader’s circumstances.
Updates and corrections
The displayed update date comes from the article’s WordPress record. Substantive corrections should change that record and be checked against the relevant source. Reports submitted through the correction form are stored privately for an administrator to review; there is no guaranteed response time.
Claims we avoid
We do not guarantee reconciliation, rank providers by unverified success rates or treat price as proof of quality. We do not classify every relationship difficulty as a mental disorder. Where information is uncertain, the article explains what a reader should confirm with a qualified professional or provider.